motion in substance of human and dasein self projection in the philosophy of mulla-sadra and heidegger

one of the most important issues in philosophy of religion is theanthropology, because the human being is both receiver and addresseeof religion. our view to religion can be changed by our view to human.the present article wants to compare the insight of twophilosophers-one of them from the east and the other from the west. mulla-sadra with the presentation of motion in substance in the center of hisphilosophy, tried to explain the relationship between human and theworld. this scheme is based on the fundamentality of being, founds human progressive movement in universe stages and the creation of man in nature, worldlylife and in the end, his death is explained in detail. againstmulla-sadra speaks the language of classical philosophy, heidegger'sattempt to create a new philosophical language. because he did notknow classical philosophical language enough to interpret the newontology. his philosophy is based on the fundamentality of being also and there are manysimilarities between his ideas and sadra's thoughts. heidegger believedthat the man - dasein - is constantly in the becoming and growing upand always is coming out from self and heading to future.this article is to analysis the similarities and differences into twophilosophers thought by explainition of the motion in substance theory ofmulla-sadra in man, human progressive movement in universe stages, outwardprojection of self and the dasein relation with universe in theheidegger's philosophy.